"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
09/24/2018 at 13:37 • Filed to: None | 2 | 12 |
!!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!!
Seller is either an idiot or has a sense of humor. Probably the latter (see pics
3 and 4 which are from the CL listing).
HFV has no HFV. But somehow has 2 motorcycles
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
09/24/2018 at 13:40 | 5 |
The car for the man that says “I’ll just leave those shoulder belts tied up on the ceiling.”
Future next gen S2000 owner
> HFV has no HFV. But somehow has 2 motorcycles
09/24/2018 at 13:48 | 1 |
“ Seat belts? What are you, a girl? Hold my beer.”
RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
09/24/2018 at 13:52 | 4 |
Chariotoflove
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
09/24/2018 at 13:58 | 1 |
You’re referring to the finger in only one pic and the others that show the plate? I love that. Could this car actually bring $20k?
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Chariotoflove
09/24/2018 at 14:00 | 1 |
Yup and IDK
lone_liberal
> RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
09/24/2018 at 14:16 | 0 |
It’s the NACA Ducts. Everybody love NACA Ducts.
lone_liberal
> Chariotoflove
09/24/2018 at 14:23 | 2 |
I’m asking your last question too. I suppose if it’s a ‘71 with a decent engine choice it might be able to just get there but I don’t think this car with its automatic can. Then again, I have no idea of where the market for the big Mustangs is at.
My X-type is too a real Jaguar
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
09/24/2018 at 14:55 | 1 |
You’ll find one in every car kid, you’ll see.
WilliamsSW
> Chariotoflove
09/24/2018 at 15:03 | 1 |
I look at a lot of old muscle cars, but not Fatstangs in particular (they’re really not my thing) . It’s got a less than ideal drivetrain, but I would *think* that if the body is all metal (who knows if it is from the ad) and this is a true Mach 1, that is in the right range. If it’s full of bondo, then it’s a massive crack pipe.
WilliamsSW
> HFV has no HFV. But somehow has 2 motorcycles
09/24/2018 at 15:04 | 1 |
Speaking as someone who vividly remembers those things, virtually *everyone* left those shoulder belts looped on the ceiling in the 70's and 80's. And the odds are the lap belt never moved, either.
Chariotoflove
> WilliamsSW
09/24/2018 at 15:05 | 1 |
I really don’t know the market for these things, but it’s not flawless by admission of the owner and needs some stuff. So, I’d say that’s pretty steep for a mass produced ‘71 anything from Ford. But I asked because I’ m not in touch with such things.
WilliamsSW
> Chariotoflove
09/24/2018 at 15:15 | 1 |
It’s a quasi-muscle car. Not a real muscle car, but not just a plane jane Mustang, either.
For cars of that vintage and earlier, you can get close to 20k for almost anything that is a) a 2 door hardtop, AND b) has a V8; AND c) has a straight, metal body. It’s that last qualifier that most cars fail.
A quick perusal of Auto Trader classics shows a lot of similar cars (fastbacks, but nicer mostly) running $21-40k, but there are a couple in the $15-18k range too . 351/slushbox seems to be a common drivetrain, and the coupes are definitely cheaper than the fastbacks.
If I wanted this (I don’t), I’d go drive it, crawl around underneath it, go over it with a magnet, and maybe offer $15-16k and see where it goes.